Analysis Of Chiropractic Spinal Manipulation Therapy ( Smt...

Chiropractors are extensively sought out in North America, and throughout the world, primarily in high-income countries. Their treatment for lower back pain consists of a wide variety of combined therapeutic treatments including different physical therapies, exercise programs, acupuncture, nutritional and lifestyle education. But primarily chiropractors are known for their expertise is the use of Spinal Manipulation therapy or â€Å"adjustments† which is a very common treatment of both chronic and acute lower back pain. Chiropractic spinal manipulation therapy (SMT) uses high-velocity low amplitude (HLVA) techniques that is a very hands on therapy directed at the patient s spine. SMT involves various mobilization and manipulation techniques. The chiropractor manipulates the patient’s spine, by passively increasing their joints range on motion. The therapist will then apply a focused and direct thrust at or near the end feel of the joint. Typically an audible crack ca n be heard indicating a successful adjustment. There are two different theories into how SMT decreases lower back pain and improves function. First, the mechanical approach theorizes that SMT acts on a functional spinal lesion â€Å"subluxation† and that the forced manipulation reduces internal mechanical stress. Thus resulting in an improved function and decreased pain. The second theory focuses on the neuromuscular system. The neuromuscular approach theorizes that SMT exerts its effect on afferent neurons along the

Britain as an Awkward Partner in the European Community...

Britain as an Awkward Partner in the European Community Britain emerged from the war in a relatively favourable position, compared to its European neighbours. In 1946 industrial production was as high as at any time pre-war, and increasing quite fast. By the end of the year exports had regained their pre-war level along with this there was little unemployment and retail prices remained fairly stable. All this contrasted strongly with the situation in France, Germany and Italy. Indeed in the late 1940s and into the early 1950s Britains economy performed better then its European counterparts. Churchill suggested that France and West Germany should lead the creation of a new Europe for justice,†¦show more content†¦The official line on Britains non-entry being ,we are not willing to make prior commitment to a scheme whose terms of membership are unknown. This also underlines the fact that Britain wanted to continue as before and thought it could, at the time Britain was producing about one half of the coal and steel in Europe. Right from the conception of the European union Britain has stood aloof from the union being very cautious and wary. From as far back as the creation of the European Steel and Coal Community in 1952 Britain has shown its unwillingness and reservations about joining Europe. The ECSC was set up under the Treaty of Paris in 1951 with 6 countries signing. These countries were France, Italy, Luxemburg, Holland and Belgium. Britain was expected to join the ECSC but this was not the case. Britain at the time had a far superior economy in strength than the rest of its European counterparts and felt the union would only inhibit them Economically. In 1955 a congress was held on the creation of a general customs union, to which Britain did not deem important enough to send more than a civil servant. However even he was recalled from the conference. This demonstrated the arrogance of Britain at the time that felt that these Treaties and agreements did not warrant their involvement. Further adding to theirShow MoreRelatedUnited States Of The European Union1312 Words   |  6 PagesBritain not only has a special relationship with the United States of America (USA), but also has a different kind of special relationship with Europe. The relationship is often described as ‘reluctant’ and ‘awkward’ because Britain is member of the European Union (EU), but has a number of exemptions, for example Britain is not part of eurozone or the Schengen area. Today, the debate is if there are more benefits or disadvantages to Britain’s membership in the EU; there is no clear answer. HoweverRead MoreBritain And The Eu : How National Sovereignty And Eu Suprantionalism Play Out1578 Words   |  7 PagesBritain and the EU: How national sovereignty and EU-suprantionalism play-out. Britain’s membership of the European Union (EU) has produced a well-documented history of aloofness, vetoes, opt-outs, referenda as well as intensely contested domestic political debates. (Pilkington Watts 2005; Gowland Turner 2000; Wall 2008) It has been described as the ‘awkward partner’ (George, 1998) and a ‘stranger in Europe’ (Wall, 2008) and has long been cautious of European integration. It is widely anxiousRead MoreA Brief Note On The United Kingdom And The European Kingdom2007 Words   |  9 PagesEuroscepticism in the UK is the distrust and scepticism of the relationship between the United Kingdom and the European Union and is considered a controversial and important concept in British Politics. This increase in Euroscepticism in the UK has contributed to an EU referendum on the 23rd June 2016, during which the United Kingdom will either decide to continue as a member state or to leave the European Union. Euroscepticism within the United Kingdom is an increasingly relevant topic. I am going to exploreRead MoreBritain’s Support for Widening but NOT Deepening the European Union2076 Words   |  9 PagesOver the last 30 years Britain has consistently supported the enlargement of the European Union (EU). Both the former Conservative, and the current Labour governments have always presented favourable rhetoric for the ‘widening’ of the EU. This apparent consensus on European policy belies the fractious nature of opinions in Britain over the future of Europe. The rough undercurrents of Britain’s contingent support for the intergovernmental vision of the EU reflects just how complex and protracted theRead MoreEuroscepticism and Uk2245 Words   |  9 PagesEuroscepticism in Great Britain 4 Great Britain and Europe 5 Conclusion 6 Bibliography 7 Introduction â€Å"We are with you, but not of you,† the famous quote by Winston Churchill in 1948 what unofficially stated Great Britain’s political position towards Europe. Great Britain has been an awkward partner in Europe for a long time. Non-willingness to be described as a part of Europe, the refusal to join European Coal and Steel Community in 1951 (predecessor of the European Community and European Union), the willingnessRead MoreShould the Uk Leave the Eu?1719 Words   |  7 PagesNikolai Cremo Understanding the European Union Professor Eiko Thielemann October 14th, 2012 Should the UK remain a member of the European Union? The issue of whether or not the United Kingdom should remain a member of the European Union has been debated heavily over the past decade, with the debate heating up even more from the current European Sovereign Debt Crisis. Recent polls of the UK population showed that around half of the UK’s citizens would vote to pull out of the EU if it wentRead MoreThe Relationship Between Britain and the European Union Essay3101 Words   |  13 PagesRelationship between EU and Britain. The European Union formed after long years of negotiations and meetings between member states of Europe because of common interests and goals on economic, social, and foreign policies. To maintain the Union as a group, it has gone through many alterations in its policies like increasing the legislative power of the European Parliament, increasing its member states and many treaties like Treaties of Rome, Maastricht Treaty have been signed to control the governanceRead MoreNational and European Identity 1273 Words   |  6 PagesScholars of the European Union (EU) have a strong interest in the concept of European Union identity (Cram, 2009). The ‘European union’ identity can be identified nowadays, although there are still conflicts between national identities and a shared European identity which can be illustrated by the data from Eurobarameter and other sources. Most people perceive themselves as Europeans, as Anderson (1991) state, there is no contradictory between E urope and nation-state, ‘country first, but Europe,Read MoreMusculoskeletal Disorder Among University Students27133 Words   |  109 Pagescomputers. This, coupled with the widespread of computers have contributed to the huge amount of research based on office workers, these researches and studies have identified the computer-related risk factors as; duration of use, frequency of use and awkward posture. However, there is limited study found on university students’ computer usage and the prevalence of musculoskeletal discomfort, despite the fact that computers have become an essential tool in students’ academic life. Therefore, there isRead MoreComparative Lexicology8448 Words   |  34 Pages7. Celtic borrowings When the Anglo-Saxons took control of Britain, the original Celts moved to the northern and western fringes of the island which is why the only places where Celtic languages are spoken in Britain today are in the west (Welsh in Wales) and north (Scottish Gaelic in the Scottish Highlands). Celtic speakers seem to have been kept separate from the Anglo-Saxon speakers. Those who remained in other parts of Britain must have merged in with the Anglo-Saxons. The end result is

What Led to the Collapse of Consensus free essay sample

The 1950’s and early 1960’s was a time of consensus in the US. By the middle of the 60’s the US experienced a series of shocks which undermined consensus. The assassination of President Kennedy in Dallas in 1963. The differences in the civil rights movement. The escalation of the Vietnam War. All of these factors undermined American confidence to change the world and improve the country. By the late 60’s, US society was polarised: divided between different viewpoints: Youth culture; counter-culture, and multiculturism. The youth culture was created due to a baby boom in the 50’s and 60’s as this led to a large youth population. Most children stayed in school and university for longer. Most had more money because of the affluent society either from their parents of part-time jobs. As a result, they developed their own culture. Teenager became the term used to describe the years between childhood and adult years. The generation gap between adults and the teenager became obvious. J. D.Salinger’s â€Å"The Catcher in the Rye†, published in 1951 told the story of a restless teenager, Holden Caulfield who rejected the hypocrisy of adult life: â€Å"If you want the truth they’re all bunch of phonies†. The book was banned in schools in 15 states. Youth culture was the basis upon which consensus was destroyed. Rock ‘n’ Roll was a way of expressing the generation gap, unfortunately parents called it the devil’s music. Radio helped spread it with disc jockeys and the Top 20 with cheap 45 rpm singles and the LP in 1948 and juke boxes. Record sales were over $5000 million in 1960. The stars were Chuck Berry and Elvis Presley. Adults thought Elvis was obscene. The car became a symbol of restless youth. To cater for the mobile teenage and youth market, businessmen developed drive-in movie theatres and drive-in diners. Rock ‘n’ Roll was catalyst for the youth culture to develop, intensifying its effect on the collaps of consensus. Some of these young people became known as delinquents: young people who were in trouble with the law. Comics were often blamed. There was an increase in drunkenness and fighting. Movies were blamed, such as: Rebel without a Cause which starred James Dean. The Blackboard jungle featured rebellious students. Some blamed Rock ‘n’ Roll music. There was a fear of open revolt against society: â€Å"The gangster of tomorrow is the Elvis Presley of today†. These young people were actively working to bring down the consensus which had dominated the US for the past decade. This led to a sexual revolution. The was because of the greater freedom of the pill. The women;s movement and Supreme Court decision to make explicit books more availible. Movies also became more explicit. By the 1970’s the spreqda of benereal diseases and AIDs caused many young people to avoid casual relations. By the 80’s there an emphasis on virginity and celibacy. The dominant trends of independence, freedom, the consumer markey and wealth in youth culture remained. Pop music, fashion, smoking and drugs continued to be the expressions of youth cutlure. By now, the collaps of consensus was in full swing; the next development would be that of a counter-culture. Counter culture was the desire for an alternative. It grew because of the influence of the civlil right’s movement; the growing of the anti-war movement; the acceptance that everyone had rights. The increase on the university population from 16 million in 1960 to 25 million in 1970 helped also. Drugs had a dramatic effect. Perhaps the greatest pastor of counter-culture was Norman Mailer. He published 39 books, plays, screen plays, poems, articles. Some of his books included: The White Negro; An American Dream; Why Are We in Vietnam; Armies of the Night; and Of a Fire on the Moon. He co-founded the Village Voice, one of the earliest underground papers and articles. He saw the US and the USSR as totallitarian societies. He felt the US’s power structure destroyed individualism. Betty Friedman was also an advocate of counter-culture. She attacked the idea that women could only get satisfaction and fulfillment from rearing childrem and minding the house in her book called â€Å"The Feminine Mystique†. The main idea of the book was that women were the victim of a set of values and culture. This was hte feminine mystique. She later whote â€Å"The Second Stage† which assessed the state of the women’s movement ten years later. Both Mailer and Friedman, through the promotion of counter-culture, were helping the collapse of consensus in America. Hippies were paramount to the counter culture. They were mainly middle class and white college dropouts. They rejected material wealth and the consumer society. They rejected war, poverty and injustice. They promoted freedom of expression and questioned authority. They wore colourful clothes and wore their hair and beards long. They lived together in communes or tribes or families, practicing free love. They took drugs, paticularly marijuana and LSD and listened to acid rock. Some experimented with different religions. Some experiemented with different religions. The numbers were small living in the Haight-Ashbury district of San Francisco and the East Village of New York City. They spoke of peace, love and beauty. They were the free people. Hippies were the physical representation of the collapse of consensus. Integegral to the counter culture were rock festivals. Here, hippies folowed the music of â€Å"peace and love†. Groups like the Gratful dead and Jefferson Airplane. A number of rock festivals gave expression to this including: Crosby Stills and Nash at the San Fransisco bay area: Human Be-In and A Gathering of the Tribes and the most famous Woodstock, in NY, in 1969 when 300,000 turned up and there was no trouble. This was in contrast to the Rolling Stones’ Altamont Festivak where Hells Angels acted as security gaurds and treated the crowd badly, resultng in deaths. The Manson family showed another type of counter culture, where they murdered Sharon Tate and four friends. The publicity the hippies receieved created strong antagonism among working class youth, workers and middle class America. This increased class tension. Ronald Reagan when he was governor of California expressed this hostility when he declared: a hippie is a person who â€Å"dressed like Tarzan, has hair like Jane, and smells like Cheetah†. Until its demise, counter culture had a profound effect on the collapse of consensus. Multiculturalism was also a part of the collapse of consensus. During the 19th and early 20th century, the US became the melting pot because of the arrival of immigrants from different countries. They lived in seperate neighbourhoods but were expected to follow the American way of life. There was an expectation that social unity was needed to develop a strong state. People became Americanised through schools, the spread of popular culture and growing prosperity. This multiculurism wouldn’t have been a problem for consensus, had ethnic pride not developed. Black leaders encouraged black pride in their history. They wanted black studies in schools and universities. They wanted to trace their heritage. They wanted to be called African Americans. Mexican-Americans wanted to be called Chicanos. They wanted to be educated through Spanish. Some used the slogan Brown Power. Mexicon=Americans were part of the wider Hispanic community-people from Latin American and the Caribbean. By the 1990’s they were the largest minority group in the US. Native Americans of American Indians numbered 1 million in the 1960’s. They forced teh white government to help their social and economic situation. The Indan Self-Determination Act, 1975 was passed which gave Indians control oftheir reservations. Mulitculutralism was an ever present factor in the collapose of consensus. Ethinic pride developed because: the growth of the civil rights movement made people aware of their identity; many wanted a distinct identity that would counteract consumer culture; US immigration laws changed in 1965. This led to a break down in teh civil-rights movement. Malcolm X led a more radical group which advocated violence and supported black nationilism why they called â€Å"black power†. This showed a growing pride in being African-American. The Black Panters wanted to gain power â€Å"through the barrel of a gun†. The national origins quote which favoured Europeans was widened. Racial and dialect jokes were frowned upon. Descendents tried to discover their roots. Some home countries saw this as an opportunity for influence in America. Now multicultruism was working to bring about the collapse of consensus. There was opposition to mutliculurism. Some said it created divisions and undermoned beliefs that held the country together. These were part of the new right under President Reagan. Some argued it led to a dumbing down in education. That reading levels had declined in elementary schools. That increasing cultural divergence and rivalry could cause serious social problems and conflicts. There was a likelyhood of fragmented and seperate communities which could cause conflict in the future.